Risk factors for treatment failure following cold coagulation cervical treatment for CIN pathology: a cohort-based study (2015)

Type of publication:
Journal article

Author(s):
*Papoutsis D., *Underwood M ., *Parry-Smith W., *Panikkar J.

Citation:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, May 2015, vol./is. 292/6(1329-1337)

Abstract:
Purpose: To determine any risk factors for cytology recurrence in women after cold coagulation ablative treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of a cohort of women having had cold coagulation between 2001 and 2011 in the colposcopy unit of an NHS hospital. We retrospectively collected data from our colposcopy unit database. Women with previous cervical treatment were excluded. Results: 559 eligible women we re identified with a mean age of 28.7 +/- 6.2 years. Nulliparous women were 66.3 % with smokers involving 35.3 %. Referral cytology, pretreatment cervical punch biopsies and colposcopy were high grade in 51.9, 71.9 and 45.8 % of women. Endocervical crypt involvement (ECI) on pretreatment cervical punch biopsy involved 9.7 % of women. Mean follow-up was 3.1 +/- 2.4 years. Overall cytology recurrence (mild/moderate/severe dyskaryosis) at 6 and 12 months follow-up was 7.4 and 5 %. High-grade cytology recurrence (moderate/severe dyskaryosis) involved 2.7 % of women over the entire follow-up period . Multiple regression analysis showed that ECI on pretreatment cervical pun ch biopsy was a risk factor for high-grade cytology recurrence (HR 3.72; 95 %CI 1.18-11.71; p = 0.024). There were no risk factors identified for overall cytology recurrence. However, when cytology tests with borderline nuclear changes at follow-up were pooled with mild/moderate/severe dyskaryosis cytology tests, then parity >2 was a risk factor for abnormal cytology (HR 1.71; 95 %CI 1.08-2.69; p = 0.022). Conclusions: Endocervical crypt involvement on pretreatment cervical punch biopsy and multiparity >2 are risk factors that increase the likelihood of abnormal cytology following cold coagulation. These two risk factors should be taken in consideration when performing cold coagulation cervical treatment for CIN pathology.

Success rate of cold coagulation for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective analysis of a series of cases (2015)

Type of publication:
Journal article

Author(s):
*Parry-Smith W, *Underwood M , De Bellis-Ayres S, *Bangs L, Redman CW, *Panikkar J.

Citation:
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, January 2015, vol./is. 19/1(17-21), 1089-2591;1526-0976 (13 Jan 2015)

Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To establish the cure rate at 1 year of patients who have undergone cold coagulation for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).DESIGN: Retrospective review of data for all patients at Shrewsbury and Telford NHS Trust who had undergone cold coagulation as part of their treatment for CIN between 2001 and 2011. Follow-up data up to December 2012 were analyzed. SETTING: Colposcopy Department, Shrewsbury and Telford NHS Trust, United Kingdom.POPULATION: Women undergoing cold coagulation for the treatment of CIN between 2001 and 2011, with cytologic follow-up until December 2012. METHODS: Patients were identified using a local colposcopy database. Data were obtained via the local histopathology reporting systems. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata/IC 10.1 software. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Posttreatment cytology and whether subsequent treatment was required, with histology results. RESULTS: Data on 557 patients were collected and analyzed. Pre-cold coagulation treatment histologic findings were CIN 1 in 156 patients (28.01%), CIN 2 in 260 patients (46.68%), and CIN 3 in 141 patients (25.31%). The median length of time between cold coagulation treatment and first follow-up smear, used to calculate cure rates at around 1 year, was 406 days (interquartile range 123 days, range 169-3,116 days). The cure rate after cold coagulation was 95.7% at around 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Cold coagulation has a cure rate comparable to that of excisional treatments such as large loop excision of the transformation zone and should be considered more widely in patients undergoing primary treatment for CIN, where there is no suspicion of invasive disease on history, examination and cytologic results.