National multi-specialty robotic surgery training curriculum and implementation for UK surgical residents: a delphi consensus (2026)

Type of publication:

Journal article

Author(s):

Francis N; Shakir T; McLarty E; Haddad F; *Farquharson A; Garnham A; Siddiq S; Bannon A; Collins J; Yassin N

Citation:

Journal of Robotic Surgery. 20(1), 2026 Aug 29.

Abstract:

Robotic-assisted surgery is now established across multiple surgical specialties in the United Kingdom, yet training for surgical residents remains variable, resource-dependent, and insufficiently standardised at national level. This study sought multispecialty expert consensus on the essential components of a national robotic surgery training curriculum for UK surgical residents. A four-round modified Delphi study was conducted between September and December 2025 under the RaDaR network of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Round 1 used open-ended questionnaires with independent dual-coder thematic analysis; Round 2 was a hybrid face-to-face and online meeting with live anonymous electronic voting; Rounds 3 and 4 were online questionnaires addressing statements not yet reaching the pre-defined consensus threshold of 70% agreement or greater. The panel comprised consultant surgeons, surgical trainees, curriculum and training authorities, and industry representatives with deliberately bounded, non-clinical input. 25 participants completed the final round. Of 26 statements, 22 (84%) reached consensus. A three-tier framework of device, basic skills, and procedural training was endorsed, with device training introduced during Phase 1 (76%) and basic skills and procedural training introduced after Phase 1 (96% and 88% respectively). Competency assessment integrated within the Annual Review of Competence Progression was supported (84%), alongside multi-source funding; trainee self-funding was not endorsed. This consensus offers a pragmatic foundation for standardising robotic surgery training for UK residents, contingent on coordinated investment in platform access, simulation infrastructure, and faculty development.

DOI: 10.1007/s11701-026-03864-x

Link to full-text [open access - no password required]