Type of publication:
Conference abstract
Author(s):
*Khallaf L.; *Muniu S.; *Sakremath R.; *Lee S.
Citation:
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Conference: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Conference, RCPCH 2025. Glasgow United Kingdom. 110(Supplement 1) (pp A301-A302), 2025. Date of Publication: 01 Jun 2025.
Abstract:
Why did you do this work? Pertussis is a highly infectious preventable disease caused by Bordetella pertussis. Young infants under 3 months of age remain at the highest risk of severe disease with 9 reported infant deaths this year in the United Kingdom.1 We aim to raise awareness about pertussis infection among clinicians in our Paediatric Department through education. What did you do? Educational sessions were delivered from February to March 2024. Data was collected using pre- and post-session questionnaires to assess clinician's knowledge. The questionnaire included symptoms, signs, management and complications of pertussis infection. A teaching presentation was given in the first cycle. In the second cycle, an informative poster was displayed throughout our department. Data was collected and analysed using Microsoft Excel. The effectiveness of the education tool delivered was evaluated. What did you find? There were 11 participants in the first cycle and 9 in the second cycle. All participants in cycle 1 understood pertussis infection and its complications and recognised the importance of exclusion from nursery/school. In cycle 2, all demonstrated knowledge of pertussis symptoms and knew it was a notifiable disease. In the first cycle, many participants, 63% (7 out of 11 participants), were unaware of the process for requesting a pertussis test in our department, which improved slightly to 55% (5 out of 9 participants) in the second cycle. Additionally, the rate of incorrect responses decreased between cycles for several topics: the incubation period of pertussis (54.5% in cycle 1 versus 33% in cycle 2), the appropriate timing for requesting the test (18% versus 11%), and knowledge of first-line antibiotics (36% versus 22%). The rate of incorrect responses increased between cycle 1 and cycle 2, rising from 27% to 33% for the need of prophylaxis treatment and 27% to 44% for the exclusion of asymptomatic contacts. Despite interventions, knowledge of the latter showed no improvement between the two cycles. Following cycle 1, significant improvements were noted, with 100% correct responses for how to request a pertussis test, appropriate timing for ordering the tests, and the incubation period. Both cycles demonstrated improvement as all participants knew the first-line antibiotic treatment for pertussis. What does it mean? Although our sample size was small, our project showed that the overall knowledge of our clinicians improved in the 2 cycles. Ongoing education is needed to improve awareness of pertussis infection, especially during the winter months.
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2025-rcpch.413
Link to full-text [NHS OpenAthens account required]
