Type of publication:
Conference abstract
Author(s):
*Ramesh S.; *Magalong J.A.; *Parampalli U.
Citation:
British Journal of Surgery. Conference: AUGIS Annual Scientific Meeting. Glasgow United Kingdom. 112(Supplement17) (pp xvii60), 2025. Date of Publication: 01 Dec 2025.
Abstract:
Introduction: Operation notes are essential documents in patient care. The use of standardized guidelines, such as those endorsed by recognized organizations, is crucial to ensure consistent and detailed record-keeping. Documenting parameters specific to laparoscopic cholecystectomy provides valuable information for management in the event of complications and it also provides direction for follow-up care. Aim(s): This audit aims to assess the quality of laparoscopic cholecystectomy operative notes in our trust by comparing them against NHS England's GIRFT (Getting It Right Rirst-Time) recommendations. It also aims to Identify areas for improvement and implement targeted interventions. Method(s): A retrospective audit of 78 laparoscopic cholecystectomy operative notes conducted in 2024 were selected by systematic random sampling. Data were compared against GIRFT recommendations. After intervention, a re-audit of 78 laparoscopic cholecystectomy operative notes from 2025 was done using the same methodology and compared against initial audit. Result(s): Significant improvement was observed in the re-audit compared to the initial audit, after intervention in the form of surgeon education and use of modified operation note proforma specific to laparoscopic cholecystectomy was implemented. Documenting significant steps involved in Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for example, details of calot's triangle dissection, details of bile/gallstone spill and its management and mention of port used to extract gallbladder increased by 13%, 42%, and 48%, respectively. Conclusion(s): This audit demonstrates a significant improvement in operative note quality by implementing interventions from an initial audit, emphasising the importance of use of recommendations issued by GIRFT. Audits should be conducted at regular intervals to sustain improvements.
DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf270.230
Link to full-text [no password required]
