Type of publication:
Conference abstract

Author(s):
Lee M.; Blackwell S.; Brown S.; Sayers A.; Heywood N.; Fearnhead N.; *Lacy-Colson J.; Cornish J.

Citation:
Colorectal Disease; Sep 2017; vol. 19 ; Supplement S2 ; p. 39

Abstract:
Aim: An integral part of trial design is Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) to incorporate patient views and preferences. The aim of this study is to describe the conduct and findings of early PP for a trial in surgical treatment of rectal prolapse. Method: Participants were invited directly by research collaborators and through social media. Only women were invited due to nature of trial. A modified deliberate engagement process was followed. Patients provided expertise on patient experience of the condition, potential recruitment strategies, and outcome measures. Results: 13 patients attended the PPI meeting. Most were recruited by clinicians. Broad representation of age and demographic origin was achieved. Patients agreed with equipoise, and were willing tobe randomised to posterior or ventral rectopexy. Several qualities of life tools were discussed when selecting appropriate outcomes. With respect to sexual function, older patients preferred FSFI and younger patients preferred PISQ-IR. Final consensus was that PISQ-IR was the best compromise for all. Conclusion: Patients with rectal prolapse are willing to engage in PPI for researchers and discuss intimate details on how treatments have affected their personal lives. The PPI exercise confirmed equipoise and modified the outcome measure of sexual function.

Link to full-text [no password required]