Type of publication:
Conference abstract
Author(s):
*Maimuna Adamu, *Greenway Tammy, *Jennifer Nixon
Citation:
Future Healthcare Journal. 2025 Volume 12, Issue 2, Supplement, June 2025. Abstracts from Medicine 2025: The future of medicine. RCP annual conference.
Abstract:
Introduction and objective
Various treatment options are available for managing recurrent pleural effusions, each with its merits. These include: (1) symptomatic control with medication; (2) ambulatory repeated pleural aspiration; (3) inpatient chest drain and talc pleurodesis; and (4) home-based indwelling pleural catheters. British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines recommend that, in the context of malignant pleural effusion (MPE), ‘decisions on the best treatment modality should be based on patient choice’.1 There are different factors to consider in choosing a treatment option, such as symptoms, availability of resources, need for hospitalisation and risk of requiring further pleural interventions. In our Trust, this information was given to patients in an unstructured verbal context, with variation between each practitioner. The objective of our project was to provide information on the different pleural effusion management options in a standardised written format as a tool to help patients reach an informed decision about their preferred option.
Methods
This quality improvement project was conducted in two cycles using the plan–do–study–act (PDSA) methodology. The patient population included were those attending our weekly outpatient pleural list within a 3-month period, who already had a diagnosis of MPE or if the clinical details (history, examination or imaging) were highly suggestive of MPE. The first cycle involved assessing our current practice against the BTS guidelines for pleural disease. A telephone-based questionnaire was administered, assessing how much patients understood and retained about the different methods of pleural effusion management after attending the pleural list. Our intervention involved designing and producing a pleural effusion management options patient information leaflet (Fig 1). The leaflet included information about pleural effusions and each of the management options listed above, with illustrative diagrams. We received input from our Trust’s health literacy team to ensure that the information was written in a way patients could understand. The leaflet was then given to clinically appropriate patients attending the pleural list. The same questionnaire was repeated after the leaflet had been in use for 4 months, and pre and post-intervention results were compared.
Results
Fig 2 summarises the findings. At baseline (n=21), only 48% of patients felt they had enough information to choose their preferred management option if their pleural effusion recurred. None knew about the option of symptomatic management with medication. After the intervention (n=20), there was a significant improvement in understanding of the pleural effusion management options, with 95% of patients now satisfied that they had enough information to choose their preferred management option.
Conclusion
This project demonstrates the benefits of providing structured, written information to patients with recurrent pleural effusion. This intervention enhanced patient understanding and helped patients to make informed choices about their treatment options, in alignment with the BTS guidelines
DOI: 10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100412
Link to full-text [open access - no password required]
