Type of publication:
Journal article
Author(s):
*Canteenwala, Zal; Thevathasan, Joseph; Baho, Heli George; Amin, Kunal; *Jain, Dimple; Amarasena, Roshan
Citation:
Cureus 17(10): e94590. doi:10.7759/cureus.94590
Abstract:
Background
Patients with immune-mediated disease often need both dermatology and rheumatology input. Separate appointments can increase travel and delay decisions, particularly in rural settings. We evaluated a monthly combined clinic in a rural UK catchment.
Methods
We conducted a prospective service evaluation (April-October 2022) of a consultant-led, co-located dermatology-rheumatology clinic. Forty-nine consecutive adult attendees completed an anonymous post-visit questionnaire on perceived usefulness, satisfaction, avoided appointments, travel costs, and prior time off work; free-text responses were thematically analysed by two reviewers. We report proportions with exact Clopper-Pearson 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with denominators varying due to item non-response.
Results
We analysed 49 questionnaires. All respondents viewed the joint appointment as a good idea (49/49; 100.0%; 95% CI 92.7-100.0), and all were satisfied (47/47; 100.0%; 95% CI 92.5-100.0). The clinic avoided an additional appointment for 44/46 (95.7%; 95% CI 85.2-99.5) and reduced out-of-pocket travel costs for 39/40 (97.5%; 95% CI 86.8-99.9). Among employed respondents, 19/36 (52.8%; 95% CI 35.5-69.6) reported previously needing time off work for separate specialty visits.
Conclusions
In a rural, cross-trust NHS setting, a combined dermatology-rheumatology clinic was feasible and associated with high patient-reported usefulness and satisfaction, fewer duplicate visits, and lower travel costs. Findings support continued provision and motivate comparative and economic evaluations using routine utilisation and cost data.
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.94590
Link to full-text [open access - no password required]
