Bridging Communication Gaps to Enhance Patient Safety: A Quality Improvement (QI) Project on the Role of Abbreviations, Their Risks, and Pathways to Change (2025)

Type of publication:

Journal article

Author(s):

*Talha, Saarah; *Smith, Ben; *Khan, Ayesha; Gaddoura, Zaina.

Citation:

Cureus. 17(10):e95843, 2025 Oct.

Abstract:

Introduction Effective communication within the multidisciplinary team (MDT) is critical to safe patient care. Whilst electronic health records have improved legibility, the widespread use of non-standardised abbreviations continues to cause misinterpretation, risking delays, errors, and compromised patient safety. Abbreviations are often used for efficiency, yet their meanings vary between specialties, creating barriers for rotating staff, cross-disciplinary colleagues, and patients reviewing discharge summaries. Quality improvement project We conducted a closed-loop quality improvement (QI) project structured around the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines for QI initiatives. The project took place in a UK district general hospital to assess and improve understanding of commonly used ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialty abbreviations. Eighty-two common abbreviations were identified and used in a written expansion test. In cycle one (n = 45), mean accuracy was 24.3%, with no participant exceeding 77%. Following targeted interventions (educational seminars and a printed reference guide displayed in shared spaces), a second assessment cycle was conducted with a new cohort. Post-teaching scores improved by a relative 40% to a mean of 35% (range 24%-52%). Mann-Whitney U testing confirmed statistical significance (p < 0.05). Implications and discussion Findings revealed a substantial baseline knowledge gap, highlighting a safety risk. Low-cost, high-visibility measures, such as reference posters and induction-based teaching, improved comprehension and could be readily adopted in other departments. However, residual gaps suggest the need for upstream interventions, including integration of documentation clarity training into medical education and continued departmental reinforcement. Conclusion Clinicians' baseline abbreviation comprehension was poor, but targeted education significantly improved understanding. Whilst no participant achieved complete proficiency, results show that simple, resource-light strategies can enhance communication clarity and support safer care. Broader adoption, alongside curricular change, offers a sustainable path to reducing abbreviation-related risks.

DOI: 10.7759/cureus.95843

Link to full-text [open access - no password required]

Experiences of health and digital literacy pilot sites: the barriers and facilitators to the embedding of health literacy and digital health literacy activities in public libraries and community information services in England (2023)

Type of publication:Report

Author(s):Rudd, Sarah; Price, Veronica; *Curtis, Jason

Citation:2023

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns accelerated the shift to digital delivery of health services and information. This has widened the digital and literacy divide in some sections of the population, which has been recognised as contributing to inequalities in health outcomes. If people and communities are to have agency in their own healthcare decisions, they need to be provided with appropriate support. This pilot scheme sought to explore whether public libraries and other trusted community hubs can become pillars of support to individuals: who seek assistance in finding good quality health information online; who need access to digital devices; and who require advice on navigating online sources of information. This report is based on the experiences of fourteen small scale pilot projects in which public, health and prison library services worked in cross-sector partnerships and with external stakeholders, on schemes designed to improve accessibility to health information and to reduce the digital divide for the communities they serve.

Link to full-text [no password required]