Type of publication:
Conference abstract
Author(s):
*Rehman S.; Miles W.; Sains P.; Sajid M.; Baig M.
Citation:
British Journal of Surgery; Sep 2019; vol. 106, S5; p. 27-28
Abstract:
Aims: The objective of this article is to compare the surgical outcomes following haemorrhoidal artery ligation
and/or suture mucopexy for haemorrhoidal disease with or without the use of Doppler ultrasonography.
Method(s): The data retrieved from the published randomized, controlled trials (RCT) comparing the surgical
outcomes following haemorrhoidal artery ligation and/or suture mucopexy for haemorrhoidal disease with or
without the use of Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) was analysed using the principles of meta-analysis. The
summated outcome of dichotomous variables was expressed in risk ratio (RR) and continuous data was
presented in standardised mean difference (SMD).
Result(s): Four RCTs on 270 patients comparing the surgical outcomes following haemorrhoidal artery ligation
and/or suture mucopexy for haemorrhoidal disease with or without the use of Doppler ultrasonography were
analysed using the statistical software Review Manager 5.3. In the random effects model analysis no-DUS
group had shorter procedure time (SMD, 3.69; 95% CI, 2.73, 4.64; z = 7.56; P = 0.00001), better symptomatic
relief rate (RR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.07, 3.56; z = 2.19; P = 0.03) and lower risk of short or long term haemorrhoidal
bleed (RR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.25, 4.11; z = 2.70; P = 0.0007). The recurrence rate (RR, 1.87; 95% CI, 0.66, 5.30; z =
1.18; P = 0.24), post-operative pain score and complication rate were similar in both groups.
Conclusion(s): The use of DUS in haemorrhoidal artery ligation and/or suture mucopexy for haemorrhoidal
disease is not mandatory and better clinical outcomes may be achieved without its use.
Link to full-text [NHS OpenAthens account required]