Type of publication:
Service improvement case studyAuthor(s):
*Andy HarrisCitation:
SaTH Improvement Hub, July 2023Abstract:
To increase the assessment of self administration on SAU by 30/06/2023 as evidenced by audit data.Type of publication:
Service improvement case studyAuthor(s):
*Andy HarrisCitation:
SaTH Improvement Hub, July 2023Abstract:
To increase the assessment of self administration on SAU by 30/06/2023 as evidenced by audit data.Type of publication:
Service improvement case studyAuthor(s):
*Helen Ford, *Rachel North, *Tina Dodd, *Nina Sinclair, *Gemma StylesCitation:
SaTH Improvement Hub, July 2023Abstract:
To improve the communication of polices that need to be shared between divisions as evidence by a written and agreed process by June 2023.Type of publication:
Service improvement case studyAuthor(s):
*Kiya RushtonCitation:
SaTH Improvement Hub, May 2023Abstract:
To rationalise the storage space for post interview feedback, reducing the time taken to find files by 24th May 2023.Type of publication:
Service improvement case studyAuthor(s):
*Kiya RushtonCitation:
SaTH Improvement Hub, May 2023Abstract:
To improve the visibility of key tasks to 100% by 30th April 2023.Type of publication:
Service improvement case studyAuthor(s):
*Carol Bulger, *Madeleine OliverCitation:
SaTH Improvement Hub, June 2023Abstract:
Ward 9s aim was to increase their pre 10 discharges to 50% of the wards daily discharges by the 22nd May 2023.Type of publication:
Service improvement case studyAuthor(s):
*Michelle Edgar *Madeleine OliverCitation:
SaTH Improvement Hub, June 2023Abstract:
Ward 17's aim was to increase pre 10 discharges to 50% of the wards daily discharges by the 22nd May 2023Type of publication:
Journal articleAuthor(s):
Nilsson N.; Stensota I.; Nilsson Helander K.; Brorsson A.; *Carmont M.R.; Concaro S.Citation:
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 24(1) (no pagination), 2023. Article Number: 951. Date of Publication: December 2023.Abstract:
Introduction: A chronic Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is defined as an ATR that has been left untreated for more than four weeks following rupture. This systematic review aims to summarize the outcomes of chronic ATR treated using either a gastrocnemius aponeurosis flap or semitendinosus tendon graft. Method(s): A systematic search was conducted in three databases (PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane), for studies describing outcomes after surgical treatment of chronic ATR using gastrocnemius aponeurosis flaps or semitendinosus tendon grafts with more than 10 patients included. The studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the Methodological Items used to assess risk of bias in Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Result(s): Out of the 818 studies identified with the initial search, a total of 36 studies with 763 individual patients were included in this systematic review. Gastrocnemius aponeurosis flap was used in 21 and semitendinosus tendon graft was used in 13 of the studies. The mean (SD) postoperative Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) for patients treated with a gastrocnemius aponeurosis flap was 83 (14) points and the mean (SD) American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) was 96 (1.7) points compared with ATRS 88 (6.9) points and AOFAS 92 (5.6) points for patients treated with a semitendinosus tendon graft. The included studies generally had low-quality according to MINORS, with a median of 8 (range 2-13) for all studies. Conclusion(s): Both gastrocnemius aponeurosis flaps and semitendinosus tendon grafts give acceptable results with minimal complications and are valid methods for treating chronic ATR. The main difference is more wound healing complications in patients treated with a gastrocnemius aponeurosis flap and more sural nerve injuries in patients treated with a semitendinosus grafts. The current literature on the subject is of mainly low quality and the absence of a patient-related outcome measure validated for chronic ATR makes comparisons between studies difficult. Level of Evidence: Level IV.Link to full-text [open access - no password required]
Type of publication:
Journal articleAuthor(s):
Ahmed H.E.; Baldock T.; Wei N.; Walshaw T.; Walker R.; Trompeter A.; Scott S.; Eardley W.G.P.; Stevenson I.; Yoong A.; Rankin I.; Dixon J.; Lim J.W.; Sattar M.; McDonald S.; Davies H.; Jones L.; Nolan M.; McGinty R.; Stevenson H.; Bowe D.; Sim F.; Vun J.; Strain R.; Giannoudis V.; Talbot C.; Gunn C.; Le H.P.D.; Bradley M.; Lloyd W.; Hanratty B.; Lim Y.; Brookes-Fazakerley S.; Varasteh A.; Francis J.; Choudhry N.; Malik S.; Vats A.; Evans A.; Garner M.; Zbaeda M.; Diamond O.; Baker G.; Napier R.; Guy S.; McCauley G.; King S.; Edwards G.; Lin B.; Davoudi K.; Haines S.; Raghuvanshi M.; Buddhdev P.; Karam E.; Nimmyel E.; Ekanem G.; Lateef R.; Jayadeep J.S.; Crowther I.; Mazur K.; Hafiz N.; Khan U.; Chettiar K.; Ibrahim A.; Gopal P.; Tse S.; Lakshmipathy R.; Towse C.; Al-Musawi H.; Walmsley M.; Aspinall W.; Metcalfe J.; Moosa A.; Crome G.; Abdelmonem M.; Lakpriya S.; Hawkins A.; Waugh D.; Kennedy M.; Elsagheir M.; Kieffer W.; Oyekan A.; Collis J.; Raad M.; Raut P.; Baker M.; Gorvett A.; Gleeson H.; Fahmy J.; Walters S.; Tinning C.; Chaturvedi A.; Russell H.; Alsawada O.; Sinnerton R.; Warwick C.; Dimascio L.; Ha T.T.; King T.; Engelke D.; Chan M.; Gopireddy R.; Deo S.; Vasarhelyi F.; Jhaj J.; Dogramatzis K.; McCartney S.; Ardolino T.; Fraig H.; Hiller-Smith R.; Haughton B.; Greenwood H.; Stephenson N.; Chong Y.; Sleat G.; Saedi F.; Gouda J.; Ravi S.M.; Henari S.; Imam S.; Howell C.; Theobald E.; Wright J.; Cormack J.; Borja K.; Wood S.; Khatri A.; Bretherton C.; Tunstall C.; Lowery K.; Holmes B.; Nichols J.; Bashabayev B.; Wildin C.; Sofat R.; Thiagarajan A.; Abdelghafour K.; Nicholl J.; Abdulhameed A.; Duke K.; Maling L.; McCann M.; Masud S.; Marshman J.; Moreau J.; Cheema K.; Rageeb P.M.; Mirza Y.; Kelly A.; Hassan A.; Christie A.; Davies A.; Tang C.; Frostick R.; Pemmaraju G.; Handford C.; Chauhan G.; Dong H.; Choudri M.J.; Loveday D.; Bawa A.; Baldwick C.; Roberton A.; Burden E.; Nagi S.; Johnson-Lynn S.; Guiot L.; Kostusiak M.; Appleyard T.; Mundy G.; Basha A.; Abdeen B.; Robertson-Smith B.; Hussainy H.A.; Reed M.; Jamalfar A.; Flintoft E.; McGovern J.; Alcock L.; Koziara M.; Ollivere B.; Zheng A.; Atia F.; Goff T.; Slade H.; Teoh K.; Shah N.; Al-Obaedi O.; Jamal B.; Bell S.; Macey A.; Brown C.; Simpson C.; Alho R.; Wilson V.; Lewis C.; Blyth D.; Chapman L.; Woods L.; Katmeh R.; Pasapula C.; Youssef H.; Tan J.; Famure S.; Grazette A.; Lloyd A.; Beaven A.; Jackowski A.; Piper D.; Lotfi N.; Chakravarthy J.; Elzawahry A.; Trew C.; Neo C.; Elamin-Ahmed H.; Ashwood N.; Wembridge K.; Eyre-Brook A.; Greaves A.; Watts A.; Stedman T.; Ker A.; Wong L.S.; Fullarton M.; Phelan S.; Choudry Q.; Qureshi A.; Moulton L.; Cadwallader C.; Jenvey C.; Aqeel A.; Francis D.; Simpson R.; Phillips J.; Matthews E.; Thomas E.; Williams M.; Jones R.; White T.; Ketchen D.; Bell K.; Swain K.; Chitre A.; Lum J.; Syam K.; Dupley L.; O'Brien S.; *Ford D.; *Chapman T.; *Zahra W.; Guryel E.; McLean E.; Dhaliwal K.; Regan N.; Berstock J.; Deano K.; Donovan R.; Blythe A.; Salmon J.; Craig J.; Hickland P.; Matthews S.; Brown W.; Borland S.; Aminat A.; Stamp G.; Zaheen H.; Jaibaji M.; Egglestone A.; Sampalli S.R.; Goodier H.; Gibb J.; Islam S.; Ranaboldo T.; Theivendran K.; Bond G.; Richards J.; Sanghera R.; Robinson K.; Fong A.; Tsang B.; Dalgleish J.; McGregor-Riley J.; Barkley S.; Eardley W.; Elhassan A.; Tyas B.; Chandler H.; McVie J.; Negus O.; Ravi K.; Qazzaz L.; Mohamed M.; Sivayoganthan S.; Poole W.; Slade G.; Beaumont H.; Beaumont O.; Taha R.; Lever C.; Sood A.; Moss M.; Khatir M.; Jeffers A.; Brookes C.; Dadabhoy M.; Bhattacharya R.; Singh A.; Beer A.; Hodgson H.; Rahman K.; Barter R.; Mackinnon T.; Frasquet-Garcia A.; Aldarragi A.; Warner C.; Pantelides C.; Attwood J.; Al-Uzri M.; Qaoud Q.A.; Green S.; Osborne A.; Griffiths A.; Emmerson B.; Slater D.; Altahoo H.; Scott H.; Rowland D.; O'Donnell J.; Edwards T.; Hafez A.; Khan B.; Crane E.; Axenciuc R.; Al-Habsi R.; McAlinden G.; Sterne J.; Wong M.L.; Patil S.; Ridha A.; Rasidovic D.; Searle H.; Choudhry J.; Farhan-Alanie M.M.; Tanagho A.; Sharma S.; Thomas S.; Smith B.; McMullan M.; Winstanley R.; Mirza S.; Hamlin K.; Elgayar L.; Larsen M.P.; Eissa M.; Stevens S.; Hopper G.P.; Fang Soh T.C.; Doorgakant A.; Yogeswaran A.; Myatt D.; Mahon J.; Ward N.; Reid S.; Deierl K.; Brogan D.; Little M.; Deakin S.; Baines E.; Jones G.; Boulton H.; Douglas T.; Jeyaseelan L.; Abdale A.; Islam A.; Atkinson K.V.; Mohamedfaris K.; Mmerem K.; Jamal S.; Wharton D.; Rana A.; McAllister R.; Sasi S.; Thomas T.; Pillai A.; Flaherty D.; Khan M.; Akkena S.; Shandala Y.; Lankester B.; Hainsworth L.Citation:
Injury. 54(12) (no pagination), 2023. Article Number: 111007. Date of Publication: December 2023. [epub ahead of print]Abstract:
Introduction: Current practice following injury within the United Kingdom is to receive surgery, at the institution of first contact regardless of ability to provide timely intervention and inconsiderate of neighbouring hospital resource and capacity. This can lead to a mismatch of demand and capacity, delayed surgery and stress within hospital systems, particularly with regards to elective services. We demonstrate through a multicentre, multinational study, the impact of this at scale. Methodology: ORTHOPOD data collection period was between 22/08/2022 and 16/10/2022 and consisted of two arms. Arm 1 captured orthopaedic trauma caseload and capacity in terms of sessions available per centre and patients awaiting surgery per centre per given week. Arm 2 recorded patient and injury demographics, time of decision making, outpatient and inpatient timeframes as well as time to surgery. Hand and spine cases were excluded. For this regional comparison, regional trauma networks with a minimum of four centres enroled onto the ORTHOPOD study were exclusively analysed. Result(s): Following analysis of 11,202 patient episodes across 30 hospitals we found no movement of any patient between hospitals to enable prompt surgery. There is no current system to move patients, between regional centres despite clear discrepancies in workload per capacity across the United Kingdom. Many patients wait for days for surgery when simple transfer to a neighbouring hospital (within 10 miles in many instances) would result in prompt care within national guidelines. Conclusion(s): Most trauma patients in the United Kingdom are managed exclusively at the place of first presentation, with no consideration of alternative pathways to local hospitals that may, at that time, offer increased operative capacity and a shorter waiting time. There is no oversight of trauma workload per capacity at neighbouring hospitals within a regional trauma network. This leads to a marked disparity in waiting time to surgery, and subsequently it can be inferred but not proven, poorer patient experience and outcomes. This inevitably leads to a strain on the overall trauma system and across several centres can impact on elective surgery recovery. We propose the consideration of inter-regional network collaboration, aligned with the Major Trauma System.Altmetrics:
Type of publication:
Journal articleAuthor(s):
Ojha S.; MacAllister K.; Abdula S.; Madar J.; Rackham O.; *Tyler W.Citation:
Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 108(1) (pp F92-F93), 2023. Date of Publication: January 2023.Link to full-text [NHS OpenAthens account required]
Altmetrics:
Type of publication:
Conference abstractAuthor(s):
*Champaneri K.; *Miller A.Citation:
Journal of the Intensive Care Society. Conference: Intensive Care Society State of the Art Congress, SOA 2023. Birmingham United Kingdom. 24(2 Supplement) (pp 194), 2023. Date of Publication: August 2023.Abstract:
Introduction: An elderly but very active gentleman presented overnight with progressive shortness of breath and leg swelling, two weeks after experiencing chest pain while lifting heavy objects in the garden. The presumed diagnosis was a missed myocardial infarction leading to heart failure exacerbated by a new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. Despite diuresis and rate control, he became progressively more hypoxic and was taken to ICU for non-invasive ventilation. An initial POCUS scan of heart and lungs by an ultrasound fellow undertaking FUSIC accreditation showed a hyperdynamic heart, pulmonary oedema, and bilateral pleural effusions. The echocardiogram was reviewed and repeated by an advanced level operator which dramatically altered the patient's diagnosis and management. Main body: A gentleman in his early 80s presented to the Emergency Department in type one respiratory failure with a high work of breathing. Examination and investigations demonstrated raised inflammatory markers, new atrial fibrillation with a rate of 140, large bilateral plural effusions, and pitting oedema to the groin. Troponin was normal, and the BNP was 4500. ECG showed no ischaemic changes and CXR was consistent with fluid overload and/or pneumonia. Initial management consisted of supplemental oxygen, diuretics, heart rate control, and antibiotics. Despite this his oxygenation deteriorated and he was admitted to the ICU for CPAP, and metaraminol for his hypotension. An initial FUSIC heart scan did not show any signs of ventricular failure. In fact, the heart was hyperdynamic which was more consistent with sepsis. A lung ultrasound did however demonstrate large bilateral plural effusions and the significant pitting oedema of the lower limbs found on clinical examination still suggested a cardiac cause and so help was asked of an advanced level operator. A review of the images and a repeat scan revealed a severe prolapse of the posterior mitral valve leaflet with free, eccentric mitral regurgitation. The leaflet prolapse was not visible on the 1st set of images and was only discovered by more comprehensive scanning. The patient was reviewed by a cardiologist within 30 minutes and transfer to a tertiary centre for emergency mitral valve repair was arranged. <br/>Conclusion(s): Standard history, examination, and investigations of this patient led to a presumed diagnosis of ischaemic ventricular failure. While a basic heart ultrasound did not reveal the pathology, it did demonstrate signs not consistent with the suspected diagnosis prompting a request for a more comprehensive ultrasound assessment. This revealed the underlying pathology, significantly altering the patient's management. This was all done by intensive care clinicians at the bedside, significantly shortening the time to diagnosis and correct management. This case is a good example of why Intensive Care clinicians should be trained in point of care ultrasound at both basic and advanced levels.Link to full-text [no password required]