A QIP on the completion of the AMHT Form in the Emergency Department in SaTH (2024)

Type of publication:
Service improvement case study

Author(s):
*Kallum Claire

Citation:
SaTH Improvement Hub, April 2024

Abstract:
I aim to improve completion of the adult mental health triage form in SaTH ED by 20% by 31/05/2023 through the use of a poster, which will highlight the necessity of completion as well as serving as a reminder for staff to complete paperwork in the correct manner.

Link to full-text

Improvement to assessment and provision of analgesia for patients with suspected Neck of Femur Fracture in ED (2023)

Type of publication:
Service improvement case study

Author(s):
*Oleg Lujanschi

Citation:
SaTH Improvement Hub, November 2023

Abstract:
To improve the assessment and provision of analgesia (where required) for patients presenting in ED with a suspected Neck of Femur Fracture to ensure all patients meet the national standard by 15 December 2023. Additionally, the aim is to improve the percentage of patients who receive an x-ray when presenting to ED with a suspected Neck of Femur Fracture in line with the national standard of 90 minutes by 15 December 2023.

Link to PDF poster

Exploring the Impact of Interhospital Transfers on Patients Who Are Managed Conservatively Following Traumatic Spinal Injury: A Scoping Review (2022)

Type of publication:
Conference abstract

Author(s):
*Nedham M.

Citation:
British Journal of Surgery. Conference: ASiT Surgical Conference 2022. Aberdeen United Kingdom. 109(Supplement 6) (pp vi132), 2022. Date of Publication: September 2022.

Abstract:
Introduction: Traumatic spinal injury (TSI) is a devastating event that could lead to serious permanent disability to patients. Therefore, a multidisciplinary team is needed to manage such cases. In the UK, patients with a TSI score a minimum of 16 on the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and are transported to a Major Trauma Centre (MTC). In cases where patients initially present to a none MTC, patients are stabilised and transferred to MTC prominently. Specialised Spinal Cord Units (SCIU) are centres specialised in the definitive management of TSI patients and it is advised that patients get referred to SCIU in a timely manner as studies demonstrate improved patient outcomes. Early transfers are recommended due to the positive impact of early surgical decompression of the injury, which relieves the pressure on the neural tissue. Nevertheless, is this impact still positive if patients are managed conservatively? Aim: To explore the impact of intermediate interhospital transfers on TSI patients when no surgical intervention is taking place. Method(s): A scoping review is utilised to explore the research question. CINAHL, MEDLINE, Pubmed, Cochrane library and ASSIA were the search engines utilised. Result(s): The search resulted in 4,595 papers. 15 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and included in the review. Conclusion(s): There are no studies that directly explored the impact of transfer on conservatively managed patients, and most of the studies were of low-quality evidence. Age, length of stay, mechanism of injury and cost were all explored as factors related to patients transfer status.

Link to full-text [NHS OpenAthens account required]

Emergency management of neck stoma patients during the coronavirus pandemic: a national nurse survey (2021)

Type of publication:
Journal article

Author(s):
Senior A.; *Chan J.; Brookes K.; *Jolly K.; *Darr A.; *Ameen R.

Citation:
British Journal of Nursing; Jun 2021; vol. 30 (no. 12); p. 742-746

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Neck stoma patient care involves significant clinical complexity. Inadequate staff training, equipment provision and infrastructure have all been highlighted as causes for avoidable patient harm.
AIMS: To establish the perception of knowledge and confidence levels relating to the emergency management of neck stomas among UK nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHOD(S): A nationwide prospective electronic survey of both primary and secondary care nurses via the Royal College of Nursing and social media. FINDINGS: 402 responses were collated: 81 primary care and 321 secondary care; the majority (n=130) were band 5. Forty-nine per cent could differentiate between a laryngectomy and a tracheostomy; ENT nurses scored highest (1.56; range 0-2) on knowledge. Fifty-seven per cent could oxygenate a tracheostomy stoma correctly and 54% could oxygenate a laryngectomy stoma correctly. Sixty-five per cent cited inadequate neck stoma training and 91% felt inclusion of neck stoma training was essential within the nursing curriculum.
CONCLUSION(S): Clinical deficiencies of management identified by nurses can be attributed to a lack of confidence secondary to reduced clinical exposure and education.

Link to full-text [OpenAthens account required]

Is pain properly managed in children presenting with fractures? A retrospective audit of children presenting to the emergency department (2020)

Type of publication:
Conference abstract

Author(s):
*Rafie A

Citation:
British Journal of Surgery; Jun 2020; vol. 107 ; p. 68

Abstract:
Aim: Pain is a common problem in the surgical field, especially when treating children – but how well is it managed, and documented? In this audit we aim to answer a few key questions. Is analgesia administered prehospital? Are pain scores recorded, and re-evaluated? And is analgesia offered and/or administered in the Emergency Department(ED)? Method: A retrospective audit was carried out between two hospitals on 100 patients aged between 5-15 presenting to the ED. A search was carried out using SNOMEDand ICD10 codes, to find patients presenting with fractures – and the ED CAS cards reviewed.
Result(s): The data showed poor compliance between both hospitals – pain scores were seldom recorded, or reevaluated; and in 58% of cases analgesia was not offered and no reason was documented. 28% of patients were given pre-hospital analgesia and only 2% of patients had an analgesia review.
Conclusion(s): Adequate pain management is vital, especially in children – as they often don't self-report pain. The study found that the worst compliance was in documentation of pain scores, and their re-evaluation. However, more concerningly analgesia was only administered in 19% of cases – and in many cases there was no documentation as to why it wasn't offered.

Link to full-text [no password required]