Type of publication:Service improvement case study
Author(s):*Gemma Styles
Citation:SaTH Improvement Hub, September 2023
Abstract:To introduce standard work to the process of defining which service is best placed to support staff projects by September 2023.
Type of publication:Service improvement case study
Author(s):*Gemma Styles
Citation:SaTH Improvement Hub, September 2023
Abstract:To ensure that all members of the governance teams (and patient safety teams) have been offered the opportunity to engage in the improvement hub training programmes (either fundamentals or Practitioner) by end of August 2023 in preparation for the introduction of PSIRF.
Type of publication:Service improvement case study
Author(s):*Nat Dulson
Citation:SaTH Improvement Hub, June 2023
Abstract:To improve the ability for colleagues to engage and communicate ideas for improving care as measured by an increase in submitted ideas by June 2023.
Type of publication:
Service improvement case study
Author(s):
*Erin Tsang (Therapy Quality Improvement Lead)
Citation:
SaTH Improvement Hub, 2022
Abstract:
NHS Staff Survey results, staff listening events and informal feedback indicated reduced levels of staff engagement and opportunities for Quality Improvement within the inpatient therapy teams at PRH and RSH. Despite embedding national job planning initiatives within the Therapy Centre, staff reported feeling unable to take their allocated Supporting Professional Activities (SPA) time and felt unable to meet the conflicting demands of their job. A model of monthly Quality Improvement Half Day (QIHD) was trialed in October and November 2022 in the Stroke and Rehab Therapy team to offer therapy staff an opportunity for regular, protected SPA time as a whole team. As a result 90% of the team felt that the sessions allowed them to develop and demonstrate their leadership skills and the team were able to implement a number of service improvement projects.
Link to PDF poster [no password required]
Type of publication:
Journal article
Author(s):
Mohammed Nazim Kt, Nithyanand M, *Dodiy Herman, Sourabh M Prakash, Shahana Sherin, *Benita Florence
Citation:
Indian Journal of Clinical Practice, Vol. 30, No. 10, p. 931-933, March 2020
Abstract:
Patients who revisit the emergency department (ED) within 72 hours constitute an integral key performance indicator of quality emergency care. The number of patient footfalls to the ED in a tertiary care hospital in a rural area of a district in India from December 1, 2018 to May 31, 2019 was 7,808 and the average re-attendances recorded during that period was 0.32%. With increase in the number of healthcare setups, rising standards of the healthcare industry and increase in the expectations of the population visiting hospitals, ED re-attendance within 72 hours has been considered as an important key performance indicator of emergency patient care. The early ED revisit rate at this tertiary care hospital for 6 months was found to be only 0.32% (at an average of 4 cases per month). This is less when compared to many other international hospitals where it ranges from 1.5% to 2.5%. Since readmissions cause unnecessary overcrowding in ED, it would be best if each hospital evaluated their rate of readmission and its causes, and then tried to address the problems found. This can be effective in better management of ED, reduction of treatment costs, increasing patient satisfaction and prevention of ED overcrowding.
Link to full-text [no password required]